I remember being entertained by Larry Ellison’s Cloud Computing rant back in 2009 in which he pointed out that cloud was really just processors and memory and operating systems and databases and storage and the internet. While Larry was making a valid point, and he also made a point about IT being a fashion-driven industry, the positive goals of Cloud Computing should by now be much clearer to everyone.
When we talk about Cloud Computing it’s probably important that we try to work from a common understanding of what Cloud is and what the terms mean, and that’s where NIST comes in.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is an agency of the US Department of Commerce. In 2011, two years after Larry Ellison’s outburst, and after many drafts and years of research and discussion, NIST published their ‘Cloud Computing Definition’ stating:
“The definition is intended to serve as a means for broad comparisons of cloud services and deployment strategies, and to provide a baseline for discussion from what is cloud computing to how to best use cloud computing”.
“When agencies or companies use this definition they have a tool to determine the extent to which the information technology implementations they are considering meet the cloud characteristics and models. This is important because by adopting an authentic cloud, they are more likely to reap the promised benefits of cloud—cost savings, energy savings, rapid deployment and customer empowerment.”
The definition lists the five essential characteristics, the three service models and the four deployment models. I have summarized them in this blog post so as to do my small bit in encouraging the adoption of this definition as widely as possible to give us a common language and measuring stick for assessing the value of Cloud Computing.
The Five essential characteristics
- On-demand self-service.
- A consumer can unilaterally provision computing capabilities without requiring human interaction with the service provider.
- Broad network access.
- Support for a variety of client platforms including mobile phones, tablets, laptops, and workstations.
- Resource pooling.
- The provider’s computing resources are pooled under a multi-tenant model, with physical and virtual resources dynamically assigned according to demand. There is a sense of location independence in that the customer generally has no control or knowledge over the exact location of the provided resources but may be able to specify location at a higher level of abstraction (e.g., country, state, or datacenter).
- Rapid elasticity.
- Capabilities can be elastically provisioned and released commensurate with demand. Scaling is rapid and can appear to be unlimited.
- Service usage (e.g., storage, processing, bandwidth, active user accounts) can be monitored, controlled, and reported, providing transparency for both the provider and consumer of the service
The Three service models
- Software as a Service (SaaS).
- The consumer uses the provider’s applications, accessible from client devices through either a thin client interface, such as a web browser (e.g., web-based email), or a program interface. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage, or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exception of limited user- specific application configuration settings.
- Platform as a Service (PaaS).
- The consumer deploys consumer-created or acquired applications created using programming languages, libraries, services, and tools supported by the provider. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, or storage, but has control over the deployed applications and possibly configuration settings for the application-hosting environment.
- Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS).
- Provisioning processing, storage, networks etc, where the consumer can run a range of operating systems and applications. The consumer does not manage the underlying infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage, and deployed applications and possibly limited control of networking (e.g., host firewalls).
Note that NIST has resisted the urge to go on to define additional services such as Backup as a Service (BaaS), Desktop as a Service (DaaS), Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) etc, arguing that these are already covered in one way or another by the three ‘standard’ service models. This does lead to an interesting situation where one vendor will offer DRaaS or BaaS effectively as an IaaS offering, and another will offer it under more of a SaaS or PaaS model.
The Four Deployment Models
- Private cloud.
- The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for exclusive use by a single organization comprising multiple consumers (e.g., business units). It may be owned, managed, and operated by the organization, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises.
- Community cloud.
- The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for exclusive use by a specific community of consumers from organizations that have shared concerns (e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and compliance considerations). It may be owned, managed, and operated by one or more of the organizations in the community, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises.
- Public cloud.
- The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for open use by the general public. It exists on the premises of the cloud provider.
- Hybrid cloud.
- The cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or more distinct cloud infrastructures (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities, but are connected to enable data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting for load balancing between clouds).
The NIST reference architecture also talks about the importance of the brokering function, which allows you to seamlessly deploy across a range of internal and external resources according to the policies you have set (e.g. cost, performance, sovereignty, security).
The NIST definition of Cloud Computing is the one adopted by ViFX and it is the simplest, clearest and best-researched definition of Cloud Computing I have come across.
On 22nd October 2014 NIST published a new document “US Government Cloud Computing Technology Roadmap” in two volumes which identifies ten high priority requirements for Cloud Computing adoption across the five areas of:
The purpose of the document is to provide a cloud roadmap for US Government agencies highlighting ten high priority requirements to ensure that the benefits of cloud computing can be realized. Requirements seven and eight are particular to the US-Government but the others are generally applicable. My interpretation of NIST’s ten requirements is as follows:
- Standards-based products, processes, and services are essential to ensure that:
- Technology investments do not become prematurely obsolete
- Agencies can easily change cloud service providers
- Agencies can economically acquire or develop private clouds
- Security technology solutions must be able to accommodate a wide range of business rules.
- Service-Level Agreements for performance and reliability should be clearly defined and enforceable.
- Multi-vendor consistent descriptions are required to make it easier for agencies to compare apples to apples.
- Federation in a community cloud environment needs more mature mechanisms to enable mutual sharing of resources.
- Data location and sovereignty policies are required so as to avoid technology limits becoming the de facto drivers of policy.
- US Federal Government requires special solutions that are not currently available from commercial cloud services.
- US Federal Government requires nation-scale non-proprietary technology including high security and emergency systems.
- High availability design goals, best practices, measurement and reporting is required to avoid catastrophic failures.
- Metrics need to be standardized so services can be sized and consumed with a high degree of predictability.
These are all worthwhile requirements, and there’s also a loopback here to some of Larry Ellison’s comments. Larry spoke about seeing value in rental arrangements, but also touched on the importance of innovation. NIST is trying to standardize and level the playing field to maximize value for consumers, but history tells us that vendors will try to innovate to differentiate themselves. For example, with the launch of VMware’s vCloud Air we are seeing the dominant player in infrastructure management software today staking its claim to establish itself as the de facto software standard for hybrid cloud. But that is really a topic for another day…
Filed under: Cloud |